The Rationale for an Evaluation Tool

Discuss the rationale for an evaluation tool for any evidence-based change project

The Rationale for an Evaluation Tool for any Evidence-Based Change Project
There are several tools that have been developed so as to meet the needs for evidence-
based projects. These include free online resources in areas such as US health surveillance,
planning and training tools, surveillance and policy tracking, evidence-based guidelines and
systematic reviews, gray literature, and economic evaluation. There is a great need to engage the
community in all steps of decision making as well as assessment (Magee, 2013). This ensures
that the community, all participants, and stakeholders embrace the evidence-based change
projects. As a result, they can contribute all they can so as to promote the effectiveness of the
Moreover, the evaluation tools should use information and data systems systematically so
as to ensure that they are relevant to the project being conducted. Decisions should be made
based on the best and most appropriate peer-reviewed evidence. It is extremely important that
both qualitative and quantitative aspects are considered. Moreover, the evaluation should be
sound and program-planning frameworks should be in place (Magee, 2013).
The evaluation tools should assess if the trial’s results are valid, what the actual results
are, and if the results are useful locally. The evaluation tools should also make sense of the
qualitative research, diagnostic test studies, economic evaluations, randomized controlled trials,
and systematic reviews. The tool in use should consider information skills, information ecology,
and levels of evidence (Magee, 2013).
It is worth noting that the effectiveness of evaluation in a research-based change project
can be very essential in making the necessary changes so as to oversee a project’s success.



Magee, T. (2013). A Field Guide to Community Based Adaptation. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.