Comments and constructive criticism

Comments and constructive criticism
The writer will have to read each of this articles and react to them by commenting,
analysing and supporting with relevant articles. The writer will have to read carefully
before giving constructive comments on the article. The writer should write a one
paragraph of at least 150 words. APA and in text citation must be use as each respond
to the two articles must have in text citations. The writer will have to use an article to
supports his comments in each of the article. Address the content of each article below
in a one paragraph each, analysis and evaluation of the topic, as well as the integration
of relevant resources to support the facts.

Comments and constructive criticism

Article 1
The writer describes the feasibility of the study and believes with the excellent team work at
the place of work, the practice implementation process will be excellent. The writer need to
expound on the study feasibility; why is the study important, or what would happen if the
practice. The potential barrier identified in the study is communication; which calls for
intense research to ensure that there is strong foundation that can help fight alleviate doubts
among the stakeholders involved (Stafford Medicine, 2016).  The issue of confidentiality is
also highlighted. The main risk identified is change resistance among the staff and patient
pulling out of the study prematurely. The benefits highlighted are mainly patient satisfaction
as it will improve patient outcome. This justifies the time and costs that will be used to
implement the practice. The study will need to be approved by IRB as it involves human
being in order to ensure that they are not harmed (Unites States Department of Health and
Human Services, 2016). 
Stafford Medicine.  (2016).  Healthcare disparities and barriers to healthcare.
Unites States Department of Health and Human Services.  (2016).  Institution review boards. 

Comments and constructive criticism
Article 2
The article argues that the practice change is feasible, but the writer states that there has been
ground of the work that have been done already; which makes me question the relevancy of
re-doing the work. The data that will be used are from Electronic Health Record; again, how
will the researcher ensure that there is patient confidentiality (Centre for Health Law and
Policy Information, 2015)? The main challenge highlighted by the article is lack of adequate
resources (regular educator) and transportation of the patient, making it difficult to implement
the practice effectively. The main limitation of risk is failing to get adequate attendance for
the program. The strengths/benefit identified includes increases income. According to the
writer’s argument, the time and costs justify the project as they promise improvement of the
clinical outcomes by increasing the clinic revenue and simultaneously reducing the cost of
care, especially among the primary acute care (DNCC, 2013).
Centre for Health Law and Policy Information. (2015). Reconsidering cost-sharing for
diabetes self-management education: recommendation for policy reform.

+1 253 220 7292
+1 253 220 7292
We tutor, coach, and mentor nursing students. We assist you to finish course assignments and projects.