Developing an Evaluation Plan

Assignment Developing an Evaluation Plan
Using 500-1,000 words, discuss methods to evaluate the effectiveness of your proposed
solution and variables to be assessed when evaluating project outcomes.
Example: If you are proposing a new staffing matrix that is intended to reduce nurse
turnover, improve nursing staff satisfaction, and positively impact overall delivery of care,
you may decide the following methods and variables are necessary to evaluate the
effectiveness of your proposed solution:
Methods:

1. Survey of staff attitudes and contributors to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction before
   and after initiating change.
2. Obtain turnover rates before and after initiating change.
3. Compare patient discharge surveys before change and after initiation of change.
   Variables:
4. Staff attitudes and perceptions.
5. Patient attitudes and perceptions.
6. Rate of nursing staff turnover.
   Develop the tools necessary to educate project participants and to evaluate project
   outcomes (surveys, questionnaires, teaching materials, PowerPoint slides, etc.).
   Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,
   located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Developing an Evaluation Plan

Before implementing a proposed solution, it is prudent to carry out an evaluation. This
allows the researcher an opportunity to determine whether the proposed solutions are effective.
Various methods of evaluation do exist and can be adopted in this project.
The proposed solution that requires evaluation is on the best strategies that can help
professionals, therapists and parents to identify, improve the level of learning, social skills and
attention among children and adults that suffer from autism to impact on overall delivery of

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION PLAN 2
care. The methods to be used in the evaluation of effectiveness of the proposed solution include
surveys and personal interviews. The survey and personal interviews will seek to find out how
autism arises and the rate at which people are diagnosed with autism. Others include;
establishing how parents contribute to the management of the disorders, effectiveness of
medication in treatment and management of the disorder and the relationship that should exist
between the people with the disorder, their parents and therapies.
Personal interviews will help the researcher to identify the strength and weaknesses of the
proposed solutions. This is achieved through open-ended questions and allows the researcher to
focus on important points that contributes to the evaluation of the solution that can have positive
impacts. Likewise, surveys are essential in many ways including helping in identification of
likes and dislikes before the project is implemented. They are excellent in evaluation of outcome;
information can be collected from various people and can be done anonymously or confidentially
hence is more valid. These surveys and personal interviews will be conducted on the professional
doctors, family therapists and parents. From their responses, the researcher will be in a position
to determine whether, the proposed solutions will have impact on the outcome or not.
Various variables that will be incorporated or adopted in the evaluation will include
intensity of campaigns and sensitization, the rate of people that develop the disorders, parents’
attitude about the disorder, family therapists’ attitudes and level of qualification. These variables
are essential and they help the researcher to respond or to get answers to various issues in the
proposed solution. By evaluating basing or zeroing on these variables, the researcher will be in a
better position to understand clearly. Various tools will be used to educate project participants
and in evaluating the project outcomes. Some of the participants may not be aware of the
problem and may not understand how to respond. Educating them on such aspects becomes

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION PLAN 3
essential to ensuring that the process becomes successful. Likewise, project outcomes should be
evaluated to ensure that they are acted upon appropriately. The tools that will be used in this
initiative include surveys, questionnaires, and PowerPoint. The choice of an instrument or a tool
will depend on various factors, the level of the participants, locations among many others.
Surveys and questionnaires are essential because they can be used over a larger
population. Through the surveys, and questionnaires, the researcher will be able to understand
the level of education of their participants and their level of understanding of the disorder
(Center for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013). From such information, then
analysis will be done to find the appropriate way forward. Likewise, these tools can be used in
finding out the project outcomes. The respondents will be able to provide their views about the
questions and after they are analyzed. Identifying the level of education of participants will
inform the way the questions will be designed. If the participants are educated, the language that
will be used will rhyme with their education level and vice versa. Another way that education of
participants can be done is through PowerPoint presentation. This kind of education may happen
in a gathering. The participants will be required to convene to a certain point from where they
will be trained about the process of filling data into the questionnaires. Training through this
platform is effective to people that are educated, however, those parents or participants that
would not poses these skills will be translated to ensure that they get the information.
Interviews can also used to evaluate the project outcomes. Some of the participants will
be asked about how they felt about the process. This will help to determine whether it was
successful or not. Project evaluation is important, as it will enable the researcher to establish
whether the project met the objectives or not. It will also enable the researcher to make
amendments to ensure that the process moves on as expected.

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION PLAN 4
In conclusion, in any evaluation, it is prudent for the researcher to have a plan to provide
direction. Evaluations should be taken with seriousness and should be accurate, reliable, and of
reasonable quality. Furthermore, it should be relevant and useful to the users. In this research, the
methods used in evaluations of the proposed solutions included surveys and personal interviews.

Reference

Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. (CDC). (2013). Evaluation methods: ection three.